請問有板友試過南氏去過敏法嗎? - 過敏
By Ophelia
at 2017-09-21T22:22
at 2017-09-21T22:22
Table of Contents
※ 引述《tomato11 (tomato11)》之銘言:
: 各位板友大家好,這是在下過敏板首PO
: 原因是過敏問題困擾我許久
: 偶然看見南氏去過敏法,由於台大醫院掛不進去
: 看到有間南港重陽診所的黃韋皓醫師有這個療程
: 因為爬文都沒有看到相關文章
: 所以只好板上求救!
: 想請問有沒有板友試過
: 效用如何?
: 推不推呢
: 謝謝大家
Google看到這篇文章 回應一下
從維基百科[1] 中可以看到
There is no medical evidence to support its effectiveness
in assessing or treating allergies.
翻譯: 沒醫學證據證明他能治療過敏
She also identifies herself as an M.D.. Her website states
that she received the Doctor of Medicine degree from University
of Health Sciences Antigua (UHSA) in January 2002. The
California Medical Board does not list an active license, and it
does not recognize medical degrees from UHSA as valid, listing it
as a "disapproved" school since 1995.
翻譯: 他自稱是醫生 但沒有執業執照
同時 他念的學校的醫學學位不被California Medical Board承認
Various medical associations also advise against its use, including
the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, the
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, the American
Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Australasian Society of Clinical
Immunology and Allergy and the Allergy Society of South Africa.
翻譯: 各個免疫&過敏協會反對NAET(南氏去過敏)的使用
當然 不能排除NAET很有用的可能性 只是目前沒有科學證據可以證實
[1] https://goo.gl/oR7NRD
--
: 各位板友大家好,這是在下過敏板首PO
: 原因是過敏問題困擾我許久
: 偶然看見南氏去過敏法,由於台大醫院掛不進去
: 看到有間南港重陽診所的黃韋皓醫師有這個療程
: 因為爬文都沒有看到相關文章
: 所以只好板上求救!
: 想請問有沒有板友試過
: 效用如何?
: 推不推呢
: 謝謝大家
Google看到這篇文章 回應一下
從維基百科[1] 中可以看到
There is no medical evidence to support its effectiveness
in assessing or treating allergies.
翻譯: 沒醫學證據證明他能治療過敏
She also identifies herself as an M.D.. Her website states
that she received the Doctor of Medicine degree from University
of Health Sciences Antigua (UHSA) in January 2002. The
California Medical Board does not list an active license, and it
does not recognize medical degrees from UHSA as valid, listing it
as a "disapproved" school since 1995.
翻譯: 他自稱是醫生 但沒有執業執照
同時 他念的學校的醫學學位不被California Medical Board承認
Various medical associations also advise against its use, including
the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, the
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, the American
Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Australasian Society of Clinical
Immunology and Allergy and the Allergy Society of South Africa.
翻譯: 各個免疫&過敏協會反對NAET(南氏去過敏)的使用
當然 不能排除NAET很有用的可能性 只是目前沒有科學證據可以證實
[1] https://goo.gl/oR7NRD
--
Tags:
過敏
All Comments
Related Posts
從不過敏到過敏
By Eden
at 2017-09-21T01:54
at 2017-09-21T01:54
台北哪間診所有開類固醇鼻噴劑?
By Damian
at 2017-09-20T10:31
at 2017-09-20T10:31
今年開始鼻過敏...?
By Edith
at 2017-09-19T15:40
at 2017-09-19T15:40
藥物過敏體質是否會遺傳呢?
By Hardy
at 2017-09-18T21:51
at 2017-09-18T21:51
蕁麻疹相關問題
By Edwina
at 2017-09-17T10:01
at 2017-09-17T10:01